Risk Partners Life Sciences Roundtable 2025, thank you very much! 

OLG Schleswig: Limitation of the liability claim
in the case of a direct claim in the D&O insurance.

There is a new, exciting ruling from the world of D&O insurance. We recently reported on the decision of the Higher Regional Court of Cologne in the context of direct action. Now the Higher Regional Court of Schleswig has also made a groundbreaking decision.

What was it about? The focus was on the question of the statute of limitations. However, it must be borne in mind that the question of the limitation period in D&O claims is not trivial. On the one hand, there is the original claim for damages (statutory directors' and officers' liability separate from the D&O insurance) as well as a claim under cover law that arises between the parties - insurer, insured persons and insured companies - due to the conclusion of the D&O insurance. Now both the claim for damages and the contractual claims under the D&O insurance can become time-barred. If the limitation period for the claim under cover law is now suspended by filing a direct claim or a direct action with the insurer, what does this mean for the necessary liability claim? Can an insurer release itself from liability in this case if the claim is already time-barred? The decision of the Higher Regional Court of Schleswig has now clarified this question.

Zum Hintergrund: Ein Brand in einer Bäckerei verursachte einen erheblichen Schaden, von dem die Feuerversicherung, berechtigterweise aufgrund der Vertragsbedingungen, nur einen Teil übernahm. (Hinweis: Daher empfehlen wir, die Versicherungssummen sowie die inhaltliche Gestaltung des Versicherungsschutzes regelmäßig zu dokumentieren und zu überprüfen.) Der Betreiber der Bäckerei machte den Restschaden geltend, indem er den Geschäftsführer wegen Pflichtverletzung verantwortlich machte. Infolgedessen trat der Geschäftsführer seinen Freistellungsanspruch aus der D&O-Versicherung an die Gesellschaft ab (siehe dazu die beigefügte Grafik). Eine D&O-Versicherung deckt üblicherweise Führungskräfte eines Unternehmens ab. Im Schadensfall müssen Ansprüche zunächst gegenüber der versicherten Person geltend gemacht werden, bevor sie gegen den Versicherer durchgesetzt werden können. Dies resultiert oft in komplexen und zeitaufwändigen Haftungs- und Deckungsrechtsstreitigkeiten. In der Praxis wird der Streit immer häufiger in einem Direktprozess geführt, durch das Abtreten des Freistellungsanspruchs der versicherten Person an die Versicherungsnehmerin. Dadurch kann die Versicherungsnehmerin ihre Ansprüche direkt gegen den Versicherer geltend machen. Zur Entscheidung: Das OLG Schleswig hat in seinem Urteil vom 26.02.2024 (Az. 16 U 93/23) festgehalten, dass durch diese Abtretung des Freistellungsanspruchs eine “Waffenstillstandsvereinbarung” (pactum de non petendo) implizit geschlossen wurde. Diese Vereinbarung verhindert einen Haftungsprozess gegen den Geschäftsführer, solange der Anspruch gegen den Versicherer besteht, und hemmt die Verjährung der gesetzlichen Haftungsansprüche. Die deckungsrechtliche Hemmung durch Einreichung einer Direktklage oder eines Direktanspruches beim Versicherer hemmt also ebenfalls die gesetzliche Verjährung.

The ruling by the Higher Regional Court of Schleswig fundamentally strengthens the position of companies that wish to take direct action against their D&O insurers. It deprives insurers of a further opportunity to reject claims without an indemnification. This makes it more attractive to take direct action against the D&O insurer rather than against the responsible managers. In addition to the transfer of control by the manager concerned, especially in the case of an assignment on account of performance in accordance with section 364(2) of the German Civil Code (BGB), there are other aspects to consider. These include, for example, the effects on public limited companies under the strict AG regime and, in principle, the disadvantages associated with the "direct action", such as contractual insurance obligations in the event of a claim. For this reason, Risk Partners will continue to closely monitor developments relating to direct action on behalf of our clients. We at Risk Partners will stay on the ball for you.

Also read our other blog posts

Being Public

Public prosecutor's office investigates: Suspicion of deception in short-time work (Sono Motors)

No startup bonus for criminal and administrative offenses. The incident and possible insurance cover. As exclusively researched by Hannah Schwär and her team at Capital Magazin, the founders of Sono Motors are now also facing problems with the public prosecutor's office. According to Capital Magazin, subsidy fraud in the context of short-time work and the programs surrounding the corona crisis is in the offing. The company, which is listed on the NASDAQ via De-SPAC, has already filed a report with the SEC. While the loss amount of EUR 40,000 is still being

Read more "
Life Sciences

Cyber Risks: Case Study Evotec

Last year, more than 10 percent of German companies were affected by an IT security incident, with the proportion rising due to cyber attacks. Biotechnology is not excluded either. It is possible to learn from the Evotec case. It is about successful cyber attacks or other incidents that are important for security, such as acts of sabotage or hardware theft. According to a representative Ipsos survey conducted on behalf of the TÜV association among 501 companies with more than ten employees. According to the TÜV

Read more "
IPO

New: Risk Partners POSI Insurance for MiCAR White Paper

MiCAR Compliance? We Cover the Risk! The MiCAR Regulation (EU 2023/1114) exposes crypto-asset service providers and whitepaper authors to significant liability risks. Incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading information in white papers can have significant consequences for Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASP) and authors—ranging from regulatory sanctions to civil claims. Our solution: Risk Partners Tech POSI MiCAR Whitepaper Protect 2025 The creation and publication of white papers under MiCAR entails complex liability pitfalls: In addition to civil claims (e.g., under the German Civil Code) and criminal risks, there is a threat of

Read more "
Being Public

Risk Partners supports successful IPO of Steyr Motors AG

We congratulate Steyr Motors AG on its successful listing in the Scale Segment of the German Stock Exchange on October 30, 2024! Risk Partners had the honor to act as IPO underwriting advisor on this transaction. Our team, led by Florian Eckstein and Björn Stressenreuter, supported Steyr Motors AG in its IPO on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Our expertise and comprehensive support were focused on providing Steyr Motors with a safe and successful start on the capital markets. We would like to thank Julian Cassutti and Christoph Cerar from Steyr Motors

Read more "
Being Public

Whistleblower Protection Act

Whistleblower Protection Act ... is now in force. Hey #VCs, do you already have a system in place for safe #whistleblowing? And what about insurance cover in your D&O insurance? One month ago today, the German Whistleblower Protection Act came into force. Since July 2, 2023, not only companies with more than 50 employees, but also fund managers or ManCos (capital management companies pursuant to Section 17 (1) of the German Investment Code) are obliged to set up and operate a whistleblower system, regardless (!) of the number of employees. As of December 2

Read more "
Life Sciences

Finance Day 2024

Growth capital for biotechnology and life sciences - Finance Day 2024 A few days ago, Jutta and Florian from our team attended Finance Day 2024 at the analytica trade fair in Munich. The event once again offered exciting expert panels on current financing and capital market issues for life sciences companies. As the panels focused on three of our key consulting areas, namely life sciences, venture capital and IPOs, attending was of course a must for us as a specialist insurance broker. Our team was also very pleased to meet many of our partners and clients again.

Read more "