Risk Partners Life Sciences Roundtable 2024, thank you very much! Sign up now for the 26.06.2025 >

Cologne Higher Regional Court finally provides clarification with current ruling
in the area of D&O direct litigation

A new exciting ruling from the world of D&O insurance. The proceedings dealt with the question of who bears the burden of proof if a company does not first take action against the managing director in an internal liability case, but instead takes direct action against the D&O insurer(s) (so-called direct action). This is possible if the defendant has assigned his/her indemnification claims against the D&O insurer to the company. But what happens in this case to the privileged distribution of the burden of proof under section 93 (2) sentence 2 AktG? The Cologne Higher Regional Court has now provided some clarity here.

How is it basically?

In the normal case of an internal liability case, the managing director must prove that he/she has fulfilled his/her duty if he/she is sued by the company for damages for an alleged breach of duty. This benefits the suing company, as this is associated with hurdles in practice (keyword: documentation - see also our webinar with Fides Technology) . This applies in particular if the breach of duty was not (allegedly) committed recently, but years ago and now leads to a claim via the statutory subsequent liability. In legal terms and in practice, the company therefore enjoys a considerable privilege with regard to documentation standards in many companies when it comes to the distribution of the burden of proof under Section 93 (2) sentence 2 AktG.

What has now been decided?

The uncertainty was whether the company would have to demonstrate and prove the breach of duty in the event of a direct action against the D&O insurer(s), which would make such direct proceedings considerably more difficult. As a result, the company would follow in the footsteps of the directors and inherit their disadvantages in terms of the burden of proof. 

The Cologne judges have now clarified that the same rules apply in direct proceedings against the D&O insurer(s) as in "classic" directors' and officers' liability proceedings. This means that the insurer must prove that the insured manager has fulfilled his duties. The insurer therefore takes on the role of the manager. 

The ruling (case no. 9 U 206/22) fundamentally strengthens the position of companies that want to take direct action against their D&O insurers. It therefore becomes more attractive not to take legal action against the responsible managing director, but directly against his insurer. The prerequisite, however, is that the managing director assigns his insurance claim to the company beforehand or, in other words, also relinquishes control over the proceedings. In addition to the transfer of control by the managing director concerned, there are other issues to be considered, such as the effects specifically on public limited companies in the strict AG regime or disadvantages generally associated with the "direct action" with reference to insurance contractual obligations in the event of a claim, so that Risk Partners will continue to follow the developments surrounding the direct action intensively for our clients.  

Also read our other blog posts

Being Public

Prospectus liability insurance (POSI): Risk Partners publishes for you

Risk Partners on Going Public and the capital market blog on prospectus liability insurance In recent months, we have been able to share our expertise on prospectus liability insurance with a wide audience on two renowned platforms. Here is an overview: Kapitalmarkt.blog In the article "POSI insurance - The protective vest on the capital market", we explain why prospectus liability insurance is an indispensable tool for companies becoming active on the capital market. The article shows in a practical way how such insurance not only minimizes liability risks, but also strengthens investor confidence. GoingPublic Magazine In

Read more "
4 pillars of cyber insurance for venture capital and private equity
Cyber Security

Cyber insurance Venture capital and private equity

Why cyber insurance does not transfer the core risk of VC & PE funds and why we have invested in Risk Partners cyber master agreements. Why cyber risks are relevant for venture capital and private equity funds With the increasing growth of the cyber crime industry (see Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution), venture capital (VC) and private equity (PE) funds and their fund managers are also increasingly exposed to cyber risks. For years, this has been reflected in the claims we have been able to support, in which fund managers have ranked first year after year among the industries we advise.

Read more "
Cyber Security

"Digital Operational Resilience Act" (DORA regulation) from the perspective of venture capital and private equity funds

DORA regulation applies from January 2025. Significance for our private equity and venture capital clients The somewhat unwieldy name "Digital Operational Resilience Act" (DORA for short) has a very serious background and is fundamentally to be welcomed. After all, when we evaluate our claims in the context of cybercrime, PE and VC funds and their KVGs are those with the highest frequency of claims. It can be safely assumed that they are a "worthwhile target group" for cyber criminals based abroad.

Read more "
Being Public

Risk Partners supports successful uplisting of Formycon AG to the Prime Standard

Congratulations to Formycon AG on its successful uplisting to the Prime Standard of Deutsche Börse on November 12, 2024! Welcome to the Prime Standard league: A new champion of life sciences and biosimilars has successfully made the step from the Scale segment. We proudly congratulate Enno Spillner, Dr. Caroline Redeker, Daniel Marquard and the entire Formycon AG team on this great success and another important milestone on their way to becoming a global champion in the field of biosimilars! Formycon AG has focused on

Read more "
Being Public

Risk Partners supports successful IPO of Steyr Motors AG

We congratulate Steyr Motors AG on its successful listing in the Scale Segment of the German Stock Exchange on October 30, 2024! Risk Partners had the honor to act as IPO underwriting advisor on this transaction. Our team, led by Florian Eckstein and Björn Stressenreuter, supported Steyr Motors AG in its IPO on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Our expertise and comprehensive support were focused on providing Steyr Motors with a safe and successful start on the capital markets. We would like to thank Julian Cassutti and Christoph Cerar from Steyr Motors

Read more "
Being Public

Global Integrity and Compliance Forum 2024 

𝗚𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝘂𝗺 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟮𝟰 "D&O and Co. - Plan B to cover personal liability!" Last Friday, Florian had the honor of taking part in the Global Integrity and Compliance Forum at the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in Munich. Under the motto "The RULE of LAW in the Era of Integrity & Compliance", international legal experts, company managers, in-house councils and compliance officers from all over the world gathered to discuss the future of good corporate governance in 2024. Key discussions and insights One of the

Read more "